How can we help you today?

Fill in the form below so we can explore ways to reach your goals or call us at 1800 577 346.

1 / 2
How can we help you?
One last step

Leave your details below and we'll be in touch.

2 / 2
Next step
Thanks! We have received your form submission, I'll get back to you shortly!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form

Drive Innovation with a Culture of Ownership, Not Blame

Drive Innovation with a Culture of Ownership, Not Blame
What's new: K-Startup Grand Challenge 2020 for Australian/New Zealand Startups! More information here.

An Honest Account from the Trenches

In the early days of Collective Campus, like most new organisations, we kept ourselves afloat by taking part time jobs on the side and working with a number of small clients who paid us just enough to keep the lights on.

After building up enough case studies and collateral working with smaller organisations, we worked our way up and eventually hooked our first big A-list client, a global law firm with over 1,200 employees and revenues in excess of US$1B.

Long story short, we f*cked up.

When the proverbial shit hit the fan, we could have pointed fingers at each other.

We could have pointed fingers at the client, deluding ourselves that “they expect too much”.

We could have put it down to human error and that “shit happens”.

We could have done all of these things... but we didn’t.

So what did we do?

We looked inwards.

We assessed every step we had taken in that customer’s journey from the initial sales meetings, through to project planning and delivery.

We were as objective as possible in determining where we could have done a better job along that journey and why said shit hit said fan.

We identified a number of things we could have done better.

We came clean to the client about how and why we had screwed up/

But more importantly, rather than just say sorry, we came up with a solution and path of action to make the situation better and went above and beyond over what we had initially promised.

Ultimately, the client was happy that we were transparent, took ownership and worked hard to find a satisfactory solution.

The Difference Between Blame and Ownership

Making excuses and pointing blame at other people, organisations or external circumstances is victimising.

Looking inwards and taking ownership over what you could have done better and what you can do to solve the problem is empowering. It empowers you and your people to take control and there is nothing more liberating.

When you’re in a hole, be it in your professional or personal life, the best way to get out isn’t to mope and complain. It’s to take action.

This initial hiccup during the early days of our company’s life served to help us build a culture of extreme ownership where excuses are simply hard to come by.

Didn’t win that piece of work?

We don’t pass the buck and say “they don’t know what’s good for them”.

We ask what could we have done better?

Perhaps we had not qualified the opportunity well enough in the first place and shouldn’t have even submitted a proposal.

Can we get some feedback from the prospect so we can improve next time?

Didn’t get a 50+ Net Promoter Score for a workshop?

We don’t say “they expect too much”.

We ask participants what could have been better?

Could we have told more stories, run more activities, articulated concepts better, provided lunch or free coffee?

Prospect didn’t return your call after an initial meeting?

We don’t call them timewasters.

We ask whether we could have better prepared for the meeting.

We ask whether we could have asked better questions.

We ask whether we should have taken the meeting in the first place.

How might we do better next time?

The Difference Between a Culture of Blame and a Culture of Ownership

You see, when you have a culture of blame the following debilitating symptoms often appear:

  • Fear mindsets
  • Cover ups and the compounding and often debilitating effect of errors
  • Steering committees are established (lots of high paid people sitting around a room regularly, often resulting in overly complex products and decisions, which all serve to radically increase cost, time and risk involved with a project, usually at the expense of benefits realisation)
  • Change and risk aversion
  • Things move slowly because every decision needs to be cross-checked with a steering committee or several other people in order to give people the cover and comfort to move forward with a decision
  • Costs skyrocket (see steering committees)
  • Unfulfilling work because things move slowly, the number of time spent sitting around in pointless meetings escalates, and value, if delivered at all, is only done so at distant intervals
  • People say “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”
  • Losing your best, most creative and entrepreneurial people
  • Attracting status quo seekers who watch the clock and don’t challenge anything
  • A company that can’t innovate fast enough to compete in a world where everything is moving fast and increasingly becoming more uncertain, volatile and complex

Contrast this with what happens when you build a culture of ownership and accountability:

  • Calculated risk taking
  • Problem solving, not finger pointing
  • Empowered people
  • Faster moving projects, as people feel more comfortable making decisions and acting on them
  • Decrease costs
  • A culture that challenges the status quo and embraces change
  • The acquisition and retention of entrepreneurial talent
  • A culture of learning and improving
  • Fulfilling work where value is delivered frequently

Clearly, a culture of ownership is required to create a culture whereby people are encouraged to share ideas, to run experiments, to fail, to learn, to improve. Basically, it’s pretty damned hard to innovate in a culture characterised by blame and excuses.

Most Decisions are Don’t Sweat The Small Stuff!

Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, who has long championed a culture of failure, puts it simply.

“Many decisions are reversible, two-way doors. Those decisions can use a light-weight process.”

Bezos goes on to say that most decisions should be made with somewhere around 70% of the information you wish you had. “If you wait for 90%, in most cases you’re probably being too slow. You need to be good at quickly recognizing and correcting bad decisions. If you're good at course correcting, being wrong may be less costly than you think, whereas being slow is going to be expensive for sure."

The problem with most cultures of blame and certainty is that we treat all decisions as irreversible and wait for almost 100% of the information, even though this is near impossible when you’re dealing with disruptive innovation and taking something fundamentally new to the market.

Final Thoughts

If utterances like “heads will roll” or “who’s going to pay for that?” are heard at your organisation, it’s probably symptomatic of something deeper and darker that will starve your organisation of the types of people and behaviours it needs to survive in a fast moving technology and business landscape.

Workflow Podcast

The WorkFlow podcast is hosted by Steve Glaveski with a mission to help you unlock your potential to do more great work in far less time, whether you're working as part of a team or flying solo, and to set you up for a richer life.

No items found.


To help you avoid stepping into these all too common pitfalls, we’ve reflected on our five years as an organization working on corporate innovation programs across the globe, and have prepared 100 DOs and DON’Ts.

No items found.


Unlock new opportunities and markets by taking your brand into the brave new world.

Thanks for your submission. We will be in touch shortly!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Steve Glaveski

Steve Glaveski is the co-founder of Collective Campus, author of Time Rich, Employee to Entrepreneur and host of the Future Squared podcast. He’s a chronic autodidact, and he’s into everything from 80s metal and high-intensity workouts to attempting to surf and do standup comedy.

Ask me a question!